Sunday, November 4, 2018

First Up, Dime Boxes; Card Show Recap #14

In what turned out to be the largest sports card show I have ever attended with the exception of The National, I'm pleased to announce that I made the 30-minute car ride up to Wilmington, Massachusetts earlier today to attend the Greater Boston Sports Collectors Club show at the Shriners Auditorium.

You may recall that I attended a show at the Shriners Auditorium back in April, but it turns out that was a different card show, not the once-a-year card show that takes place the first week of April. Although this wasn't my first show at this facility, it was my first time at this particular show, and I have to say I think I did pretty well.

As soon as we arrived at the show earlier today and entered the building, my Dad and I decided it was best to separate so that we could each do our own thing and eventually meet up in a little over an hour. As long as I'd been planning on attending this show, I knew the very first booth I wanted to stop by.

A vendor from the show I usually attend made a point to tell me he was planning on exhibiting at this show when I last went to the show a few weeks ago. Given how fabulous his dime boxes were then combined with the promise that they'd be even better, I knew I had to stop by and see what he had in store.

Per usual, a couple sets began to jump out at me and seemed to just appear in an abundance out of nowhere. This time around, one of those sets was the vibrant 2001 Fleer EX. Consisting of bold colors and chock-full of players I collect from the early 2000's, this set helped boost over 5 of my 100-card player collections as well as assist my Ken Griffey Jr player collection on route to 200 cards. 

Going into today's show, I needed just 5 new cards of his for that player collection to be the 4th to reach 200 cards after Nolan Ryan, Manny Ramirez, and Greg Maddux. Since I'm not entirely sure how many cards of his I picked up, it'll be a couple days before I know for certain.

Another set that was everywhere, and I mean everywhere, was 2017 Topps High Tek. Out of the 15 cards or so that I brought back from this high-end product, it's hard to know for certain how many different pattern designs there are considering how similar some of them look to one another. One thing's for sure, I'll be relying heavily on COMC when entering these cards in on my online spreadsheets. 

In addition to all the modern High Tek cards, I spotted an original Topps Tek card of recent Hall of Fame inductee Chipper Jones. Like the modern version, the very first Topps Tek cards also featured an extensive number of pattern designs. Once again, COMC will be more useful than you'd think as my eyes will have to work extraordinarily hard to spot the whichever specific parallel this is, made even harder to tell when these cards are scanned.

Of all the Topps Gallery sets, the best one for the art alone would have to be 2003 Topps Gallery; Hall of Fame Edition. Not only is it a set solely for Hall of Famers, but it also featured some of the brightest colors and most detailed images you'll ever see on baseball cards in any set of cards.

Thankfully, someone put the variation cards from 2003 Gallery Hall of Fame Edition into penny sleeves and labeled them "variation" in big bold black letters. Due to the sheer quantity of cards I typically have to enter in online, I don't usually have enough time to check COMC for what exactly the card is, leaving slight room for error. 

This time, I know in advance these cards are variations, so a few quick clicks online will let me know what in particular makes this card different from the regular version, and I'll make sure to note that on my online inventory.

This rainbow foil-type parallel of Tom Seaver came with the rest of the HOF Gallery cards, though I'm not exactly sure what this parallel would be called. However, when I took the time to enter in some cards online a few days ago, I discovered Tom Seaver was just 1 card away from 100. So despite not knowing what exactly this card is, I do know I have yet another player who's officially reached the 100-card mark.

It's very fitting that I found a rather strong selection of Willie McCovey cards in today's dime boxes given his passing at the age of 80 back on Wednesday as well as the tribute post I did for him yesterday.

RIP Stretch.

I suppose what I did today for McCovey is similar to what I've been doing for Roberto Clemente at the card show all my life; buying his cards as a way to pay tribute to his life. We all know the tragic manner in which Clemente lost his life, and I've made it my goal since I started collecting cards to continue adding to his collection to pay my respects to him.

On a lighter note, there were still some other players who were quite common throughout the dime boxes, one of those guys being Tigers legend Al Kaline. After a few months of having the autograph of him and Bob Gibson from The National around my house, I finally decided to get it framed a couple weeks ago. I'll make sure to do a quick post about it after I pick it up later this week.

Finally, Harmon Killebrew closes out the plethora of prominent players in the dime boxes today with more than meets the eye in terms of what I brought back. In addition to a duo of All-Time Fan Favorites/Topps Archives and 2 cards of Killebrew on the Senators, there were an additional 4-5 cards of his at least that I grabbed for the ever-growing Harmon Killebrew player collection.

Moving on to one of the more "interesting" parts of these dime boxes, for lack of a better word. It has to do with a large group of numbered cards from 2 years of the Topps Co-Signers set, 2006 and 2007.

As you can see, this card claims to be of Roy Oswalt and Andy Pettitte, though I collect only Pettitte so where I put this card won't be an issue anyway. However, the back tells a different story.

The back of the card implies that this is a card solely of Pettite with no mention of Roy Oswalt's name anywhere. Given that the front of this card seemed to equally emphasize both players, I was genuinely surprised when I turned the card over.

The same thing happened with this duo of Yankees cards from the same set, and that's not including the different colors parallels of the 2 images on the right of each card that brought some confusion. The gold one of Johnson and A-Rod is numbered to 115 on the back while the Jeter/Cano is out of 150.

Besides that smaller detail, these 2 cards do the same thing as the Pettite which I, unfortunately, didn't realize until I got home. While I collect both A-Rod and Randy Johnson, the subjects of card #1, I don't collect Robinson Cano while I do collect Derek Jeter. Alas, Cano is solely featured on the back making this "his" card despite it including both names and thus, it would seem a bit odd to place this card in my Derek Jeter player collection.

Same problems, different set. That was the case for the next year of Co-Signers which delivered similar results to the cards from the 2006 set. In the case of these cards which are part of a set that's become so confusing that I don't even know what to call them, they both happened to be of the guys I collect on the card and not the guys I don't. This means that my Miguel Tejada and Chipper Jones PCs got lucky that these cards weren't of Brian Roberts of Tim Hudson.

The same goes for Jimmy Rollins and, once again, Miguel Tejada only, in this case, the blue and gold players in the backgrounds lead to these cards having different serial numberings than the first 2. The blue of the 2 Phillies players is numbered out of 250 while the 2nd card of the 2 Orioles is numbered to 225.

I guess the best way to describe these before searching COMC is "orange foil" as this set becomes even more elaborate than I once believed it to be. Now, we have an example of these 2-player cards tricking me once again as the 1st card, numbered to 175, actually features Gary Sheffield, someone I don't collect, on the back instead of Ivan Rodriguez, one of my larger player collections.

Lastly, in what eventually became the last of these slightly-confusing dual-player cards, the Chipper Jones and Brian McCann card on the right numbered to 75, is actually McCann's as I learned from a quick glance at the back and not, in fact, a new card for my Chipper Jones PC. With that, I ended up with 3 cards of players I don't actually collect, all of which are up for trade if anyone's interested.

Moving on, I have some gold cards to help get me back into the normal 1-player per card swing of things. Including 1 from 1992 and 3 from 1993, Topps Gold cards from the 1990's will always be some of my favorite cards from the junk wax era.

It's always nice to find rookie cards for the right price, especially when these cards are from the dime bins. Additionally, while I was originally going to use the Devers card to talk about the Red Sox, I instead want to take notice of why Evan Longoria's rookie card from 2008 Upper Deck Goudey says "Ken Griffey Jr. says..." while showing a picture of Derek Jeter.

Since Longoria was in the AL, it's supposed to say "Derek Jeter says..." instead. Either I've found some magnificent error card with a fortune, or it's a mistake Upper Deck made for all of these cards, decreasing the overall value and resulting in it ending up in the dime bins.

I have a feeling it's the latter.

I must say, I have never seen a card from this set before nor do I understand why Panini wouldn't at least attempt to photoshop Craig Kimbrel into a Braves jersey for his rookie card. Despite all that, I'm more than happy to add this card to my Kimbrel Collection given that it's not every day I find one of his rookies.

It's also not every day you spot 2 unique Corey Seager prospect cards in the dime boxes either which serve to further boost what's already a pretty special Corey Seager collection of prospects, rookies, autographs, and relics. I'm starting to have a feeling that these dime boxes are pretty damn special.

I don't know if other collectors feel the same way, but I don't think there's anything more satisfying than finding a card in the dime bins that you saw online for $10 a couple weeks ago that you desperately wish you had but refused to pay that kind of money for.

Also, this stained glass card is absolutely stunning when scanned and in-person. No wonder I wanted it so much.

At the rate I'm at, you might as well throw in a collection of special Topps Heritage cards from the last few years that will either go to player collections in Adam Jones' case or towards my special cards of 2016 and 2017 Topps Heritage respectively, including a Stephen Strasburg mini numbered out of just 100 copies.

Though all 4 of these cards are silver pack cards to commemorate 35 years of 1985 Topps as stated on the backs, I'm not quite sure why the bottom 2 look different than the 2 on top. It could be that the top 2 are from Series 1 and the others are from Series 2 or Update, but I don't necessarily know why Topps felt the need to change up the design.

Speaking of changing the design, or not, I found it intriguing, if nothing else, that Topps decided to go with the same set design for Yogi Berra's Topps All-Time Fan Favorites cards 2 years in a row (2003 and 2004). Though the sets are virtually the same, the photos used are very different, one showing a much older Yogi than the other. With that being said, I like the 1st one a bit more than the 2nd.

I don't know that I've ever seen a full-blown pennant appear on a baseball card before until spotting this All-Time Fan Favorites card from 2005 around the same time as the 2 Yogi Berra cards. It appears that Bench is being asked to sign a few items, including the pennant, and the slightly-confused look on his face says it all from there.

Many years and well over 150 cards later and I finally have my first ever card showing Ryne Sandberg as a member of the Philadelphia Phillies. Considering that it's an art-based card from 2010 Topps National Chicle with clear showings of attention to detail makes this card everything I wanted it to be and then some.

But as far as dime cards go, you can't get much better than a TCMA Satchel Paige, even when you take into account as many numbered cards or shiny refractors as you can. Adding to the Satchel Paige player collection for a dime is virtually unbeatable, let alone the fact that this card is from the 1977 TCMA set. Out of the hundreds of dime cards I picked up, it's safe to say I have an easy winner right here.

Saturday, November 3, 2018

Another Icon, Gone

Although I'm a couple of days late, I'd be remiss if I didn't prepare a post in honor of Giants legend Willie McCovey who passed away Wednesday at the age of 80.

Over the course of a few seasons in his career, McCovey played alongside 3 other future Hall of Famers in San Francisco, those being Juan Marichal, Orlando Cepeda, and Willie Mays. Even so, McCovey became one of the all-time greatest power hitters, his 521 career homers placing him 20th on the all-time list tied with Ted Williams and Frank Thomas.

I feel that sometimes McCovey was overshadowed by the other major power hitters he played alongside with (Banks, Aaron, Mays, Stargell, Clemente, etc), but he was certainly able to hold his own throughout his 22-year career which saw him elected into the Baseball Hall of Fame on his very first ballot in 1986. 

To this day, he still holds the NL record for career grand slams with a grand total of 18 over his playing career which lands him at 5th all-time.

As I said before, it was extremely difficult to stand out in the National League as a hitter throughout most of the 1960's due to the strong competition and abundance of talented players. Even so, McCovey took home the 1969 NL MVP by hitting .320 with 45 home runs and 126 RBI, a sensational season to put it mildly. 

Born 4 years apart from Hank Aaron, they both grew up in Mobile, Alabama around the same time leading me to wonder if they knew each other or played baseball together growing up. I can't say I've heard anything about this topic before, but I also cannot say I've extensively looked.

Though most of his career was spent with the Giants, "Stretch" did spend a little bit of time with the San Diego Padres, ultimately leading to the production of this 1975 Topps card which has since become pretty popular and somewhat iconic among collectors. I suppose it was just the shock of seeing him in a different jersey, similar to Billy Williams being shown on the Athletics, not the Cubs, in this very same set.

In 1986, the 50th anniversary of the first Hall of Fame class, Willie McCovey, along with Bobby Doerr and Ernie Lombardi, was inducted into the National Baseball Hall of Fame when he received 81.4% of votes, the only player elected that year by the BBWAA. 27 years after making his debut and winning Rookie of the Year back in 1959, McCovey obtained the biggest honor in baseball and was enshrined in Cooperstown.

There's no way I could do this post without mentioning my all-time favorite Willie McCovey card, this beauty from 2017 Topps Stadium Club which emphasizes his #44 which was retired by the Giants in 1980, another entry on his long list of career accomplishments. Though there's certainly no shortage of fantastic photos from Stadium Club, especially 2017, there's absolutely no beating Stretch's jaw-dropping card combined with near-perfect photography.

Not only was he one of the most accomplished hitters in baseball history, but McCovey has been one of my favorite players to collect for years now. His player collection recently reached 80 cards, and I have the utmost intentions of keeping it going for as long as I collect in honor of him.

Rest in peace Willie McCovey. You will be missed.

Friday, November 2, 2018

My Ideal Topps Archives Set

With the baseball season officially over and the major baseball card releases not too far behind, I'm forced to turn my attention towards 2019. As it pertains to baseball cards, that happens to be what the sets might look like once next year comes along.

Though Topps Heritage is never a surprise release, I always enjoy reading Cardboard Connection and Beckett info articles about other sets like Gypsy Queen, Stadium Club, and Allen & Ginter as soon as they're released in order to see what the new year will bring for some of my favorite Topps products.

Similarly, I do the same for Topps Archives, but it's far less about the set design and more about what sets will be chosen. For many years now, Topps has chosen 3 sets to take up the 300 base card checklist. However, when you think about it, Archives is all about timing, more so than any other product.

You can't choose a product that's been done in Heritage recently or is going to be the focus of Topps Heritage in upcoming years. From what I've noticed, the wait time between Archives and Heritage seems to be around 8-10 years given the inclusion of the 1960 Topps set in 2017 Topps Archives.

Additionally, there has to be a balance between decades. As much as I love 60's cards, the whole set can't just be from that decade. There's usually 1 set from the 50's/60's, 1 from the 70's/80's, and finally, one from the 80's/90's as well. All of this while choosing the right players to be included in the product.

With all of this in mind, I've decided to create my own Topps Archives set using Topps sets from the past that haven't made their way into Archives yet or were represented in Heritage, but many years ago. What I've come up with is, I believe, the ideal Topps Archives set for next year.

As for the oldest product in my ideal Archives set, I went for a set that's become a collectors favorite that hasn't been seen since Topps Heritage way back in 2005. That set is the classic 1956 Topps made all the way back in the day when the dimensions of the average baseball card were larger than they were today. If you're looking to start something like Archives off with a bang, look no further than 1956 Topps.

As we saw with Topps Heritage in 2003-2005, there's no need to copy the exact size of the cards, making them the same size as they were in the 50's. Actually, it's easier to make these cards the same size as we're used to seeing nowadays so they can fit on a typical sheet or in a standard penny sleeve like the rest of the cards. Considering that minor setback was already handled back in '05, there should be nothing stopping Topps from putting 1956 Topps in an Archives set very soon.

For the set following 1956 Topps in my ideal Archives product, I chose an underrated Topps Flagship design that was last seen in 2010 Topps Heritage, nearly a decade ago. With the use of creative color combinations at the bottom of the card and the superb photo quality of today, '61 Topps has the potential to work out extremely well in a future Topps Archives set just like it did back in 2010, maybe even better.

To make things better, Archives sets typically include 1 design per year that isn't necessarily considered super exciting, at least compared to other eye-catching sets like 1977 Topps, for example. I presume Topps does this in order to have a way to show off even more of their top-tier photography while also giving that particular year of Archives a chance to stand on its own with a strong balance of sets.

It's hard to believe the most recent of the Archives sets is from 40 years ago, but trust me when I say I considered many options before making this decision. Keep in mind, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, and 1989 have all been included in Topps Archives sets beginning in 2012 along with 1990, 1991, and 1992. 

By the time 2019 begins, we will have been just 2 years removed from the over-used 1987 insert set throughout 2017 Topps, and 1988 Topps just isn't that exciting. Combined with the lack of 70's sets available, 1978 is the best option.

Granted, this Archives set will rely on vintage more so than any Archives product before it, but since when is that a bad thing? We have 9 years before 1978 Topps will be the subject of Heritage, and it's been a while since either 1956 or 1961 Topps were included in Heritage as well. Each set has something different to offer up for Topps Archives. and though I doubt this lineup will actually be chosen, it would have to be my 1st choice for an ideal 2019 Topps Archives set.

Thursday, November 1, 2018

Frankenset Page 26

Quick non-baseball related note before diving into the 26th page of my frankenset which includes cards 226-234. 

Now that it's officially November, I guess that means Christmas season has begun, or at least, at CVS it has given that my local store already had their holiday decorations aisle on full display right next to the 50% off Halloween candy. There really is no place quite like America.

Along with the end of October which just passed, the holidays are usually one of my favorite times of the year. Even if there is no live baseball, everyone just seems to be in a better mood around this time of the year. Plus, even without live games, we still have card shows, the COMC Black Friday Sale, and MLB specials to look forward to.

There are many other sports on TV as well that I could get interested in but none as much as baseball. My first choice would probably be Basketball since it's the sport I know best next to baseball, my fantasy team is in 1st place, and the Celtics were incredibly fun to watch last season.

And I still have the blog for all my baseball thoughts over the next 5 months (shivers) without baseball. Just like last year, I'll be using these posts to pass the time day by day, starting with page #26 of my frankenset.

#226 1989 Score Kevin Bass
I think spot number #226 was another example of one that I struggled to fill with an exciting card. Although I'm fond of the orange and purple color combination, the 1989 Score set isn't too dazzling, and the card lacks much personality, making it fairly average altogether. 

#227 2015 Topps Stadium Club Jon Singleton
Following a sub-par Astros card, a bold and colorful Astros card from 2015 Topps Stadium Club takes its place. Featuring the always photo-centric Stadium Club set, the brightness of the orange Houston Astros home jersey is not something you can miss, and neither is the photo quality this set has brought yearly since 2014.

#228 2001 Fleer Triple Crown Al Martin
Without the little bits of gold foil used for the important information across the front of the card, I could easily see this becoming another relatively boring card from the top row of this page of the frankenset. However, the gold adds a little bit of color, and the set does a fairly nice job of making a relatively simple set appeal more to those who see it.

#229 2002 Fleer Platinum Ben Grieve
One of the most underrated brands ever produced, especially by Fleer, Fleer Platinum lasted a couple of years beginning in I believe 2001. It served almost as Fleer's version of Topps Heritage with exciting retro-style designs, though I don't think any of them are based off any Fleer set in particular besides the first Platinum set made in 2001 paying homage to the 1st Fleer set back in 1981.

#230 2015 Topps Heritage Ben Revere
Although the set is one of the more simply-designed sets in Topps History, my feelings towards 1966 Topps are actually quite complicated. Whether it be the original set or the 2015 Topps Heritage remake, I typically find it difficult to become super intrigued by the set given how basic the design is and how, by today's standards, the photo quality in 2015 Topps Heritage is not very good.

#231 2011 Topps Heritage Chone Figgins
On the other hand, the 1962 Topps set is likely in my top 7 of favorite Topps sets ever made, and the Heritage remake in 2011 did the original set the justice it deserves. Even out of a 425-card base set full of all sorts of different cards, I recall Chone Figgins' cards being one of my favorites of the group, likely the reason why it ended up at spot #231 in the frankenset.

#232 1990 Score Sandy Alomar
I always thought 1990 Score was yet another example of a set that got lost among either an era of incredible products or an era of disappointing products. In this case, 1990 Score was produced right smack in the middle of the "junk wax era" and although it's not that incredible of a set, it's still better than a lot of what was being produced around the year 1990.

#233 2011 Topps Allen & Ginter Ben Zobrist
If I had to give 1 year of this decade the title of "best year for baseball cards," it might just have to be 2011. The Flagship design was not too bad, not to mention excellent designs out of Allen & Ginter and Heritage. Gypsy Queen was just starting out and there were plenty of insert sets like 60 Years of Topps, fun sets like Lineage, all without overproducing anything unlike 2017, a year with far too many cards.

#234 1990 Topps Mariano Duncan
I'm also kind of a fan of the colorful 1990 Topps design as it was Topps' attempt to create a vintage-style design in a modern era. Though the checklist was far too large and it didn't necessarily honor the 60's and 70's the way I would've liked, it was better than some of the sets we'd see from Topps down the road, particularly in the mid-1990's just a few years later.